Civility? On PBS, NY Occasions Columnist Tom Friedman Says ‘Trump Is a Mind-Consuming Illness’

Spread the love

The New York Occasions carried a column final weekend by Maureen Dowd the place Jimmy Carter shocked the liberals by saying “I feel the media have been tougher on Trump than another president definitely that I’ve identified about…I feel they be happy to say that Trump is mentally deranged and the whole lot else with out hesitation.” Occasions columnist Thomas Friedman took it to a brand new degree on Wednesday’s Charlie Rose on PBS. Trump is not mentally unwell…he is a brain-eating illness.

The PBS present started by previewing his quote — stick round for this sizzling take, liberals! — “Trump is a brain-eating illness, so that’s that he — he sucks up all of the oxygen within the room. We really feel we now have to write down about him a lot, as a columnist, on the one hand I do not wish to as a result of I am probably not studying something. After I wrote that column as we speak, I am simply form of emoting, expressing my concern.” 

Rose supplied the standard oblation to this all-knowing genius: “Tom Friedman is right here. He’s columnist for The New York Occasions and recipient of the Pulitzer Prize. He is greatest identified for tackling massive concepts and complex points. He’s a self-confessed explanatory journalist. His objective is to translate from English to English…. Welcome, sir.”

So Trump is a “brain-eating illness.” EPA administrator Scott Pruitt is a “knucklehead.” Chief of workers John Kelly? “He is been sullied by Trump’s metastasizing moral most cancers.” CIA director Mike Pompeo? “I feel he is actually gone over to the darkish facet.” 

Friedman and Rose mourned how Trump’s fiercest critics make harsh speeches after which announce they’re quitting: 

THOMAS FRIEDMAN: And everyone knows these of us within the information enterprise it will get worse each week. And the indicators of it getting works as we noticed this week not solely Corker however Jeff Flake, the senator from Arizona introduced that he was bowing out and went out saying principally the president is indecent, dishonest man. We’re seeing so many uncommon issues.

CHARLIE ROSE: Evaluating him to Joseph McCarthy.

FRIEDMAN: Precisely, sure.

ROSE: And what needed to occur, any individual needed to get up like Joseph Welch stood as much as Senator McCarthy.

FRIEDMAN: Here’s what I want although, Charlie, that Corker and Flake had carried out. That that they had made that precise analysis they made, after which stated “And that is why I am operating. I am not going to let the Bannons resolve. You understand what, I’ll even go down in flames however I’ll battle these concepts. I am not simply going to let you know how dangerous Trump is, I’ll run and battle for what I feel are actual conservative ideas.” 

This man just isn’t a conservative. Bannon just isn’t a conservative. The issues I study overlaying the Center East — I stayed within the Center East. Within the Center East, extremists go all the way in which and moderates have a tendency to simply go away. And that’s what I really feel we’re seeing within the Republican Social gathering now. It`s great that you’re critiquing Trump. Why not take it to the actually significant degree?

Did you catch that? He instructed Trump, and Republicans who aren’t brazenly declaring struggle on Trump are like Center Japanese extremists, that’s, jihadists. They usually’re lecturing about McCarthy and human decency? Liberals like to recommend PBS is a civil house…however that is as a result of they are not being known as terrorists on it. 

Rose did have one weak second the place he acknowledged there is likely to be a Democratic downside, nevertheless it was over rapidly. Gee, that uranium scandal is simply too dangerous, let’s acknowledge it is a factor and get past it: 

ROSE: There’s something else on the desk that got here out as we speak, this movement that the Clinton marketing campaign could have funded the group that went out to create the file.

FRIEDMAN: Yeah.

ROSE: Does that trouble you? 

FRIEDMAN: Yeah, I imply it is some — it does not shock me. I imply politics is soiled. We all know Donald Trump’s child met with somebody who appeared to entice them by saying we will do the identical with Clinton, however yeah, not one thing I’d be notably happy with. And one thing, you recognize we definitely ought to discover out about.

This final half is the place Friedman grew significantly animated, with all types of gesticulating about Trump is “eliminating household planning funding” and the way he “principally banned the examine of local weather change.” Friedman’s a type of lefties who suppose ISIS is rising in Africa as a result of — local weather change. Higher climate would stop Islamic radicalization. 

FRIEDMAN: Trump says we’ll take — we’ll assist the French as a result of the French had been all struggling, I received a thousand guys, we’ll beat again these al-Qaeda guys, that’s what Trump is doing along with his left hand. What has he carried out along with his proper hand? He is eradicated all our household planning funding for overseas international locations and at house, attempting to — 

ROSE: Attempting to take the State Division — 

FRIEDMAN: — attempting to chop all household planning funding.

ROSE: Taking the State Division price range manner down. 

FRIEDMAN: And he`s principally, he’s the knucklehead, that’s the solely — that is a pleasant manner of speaking about Scott Pruitt who’s operating the EPA, has principally banned the examine of local weather change. So take into consideration what we’re doing. Together with his left hand, he`s sending troops to Niger that are all coping with a human tragedy and dysfunction, pushed in nice deal by local weather and inhabitants, and since…

ROSE: Two issues he turned his again on.

FRIEDMAN: Two issues he turned his again on. That’s simply flat-out silly. That isn’t connecting the dots in any respect. And that’s what I imply, should you don`t get up within the morning and say what’s going on on the planet.

ROSE: How does it come collectively?

FRIEDMAN: How will we tie all this stuff collectively, as a result of I do not wish to ship 10,000 troops there. But when we do not have a local weather coverage and a inhabitants coverage, and a governance, serving to these individuals govern, then all these international locations there will not be sufficient troops to maintain them again. And Trump says he will construct a wall.

No. Mr. President, is your wall going to be deeper and wider than the Mediterranean as a result of it positive hasn’t saved these individuals out of Europe, OK? And that Rio Grande, that it is a bit consuming fountain subsequent to the Mediterranean. So you have to join the dots. And he isn’t doing that.

He’s simply saying I made you applaud. I took away — I attacked Deliberate Parenthood. Take a look at my base is applauding. I took away your local weather change. You understand, I modified coverage. Look how the oil firms are applauding. And take a look at me, I ship Inexperienced Berets to Africa, to Niger. Actual males ship Inexperienced Berets. Yay, Donald. In the meantime none of it provides up. The entire thing is totally incomprehensible. And that could be a travesty.

Rose responded with a typical Rose flourish, name-dropping  a liberal president: “Invoice Clinton as soon as stated to me, he stated what’s the greatest instance of a political intelligence, you’re imagined to be an clever man. He stated it’s the capability to attach the dots, that’s what it’s, the capability to attach.”

Talking of incomprehensible arguments, what Friedman claimed was “eliminating household planning funding” does nothing of the kind. The Mexico Metropolis coverage — put in place by Republican presidents since Reagan, and eliminated by Democratic presidents of their phrases — merely prevents U.S. overseas assist from going to teams which offer or promote abortion abroad, which is strongly supported in polls. 

As for “banning the examine of local weather change” at EPA, this appears to consult with a narrative reported by Juliet Eilperin of The Washington Put up about an EPA aide named John Konkus vetoing grant proposals that point out local weather change: 

John Konkus opinions each award the company provides out, together with each grant solicitation earlier than it’s issued. Based on each profession and political staff, Konkus has informed workers that he’s looking out for “the double C-word” — local weather change — and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eradicate references to the topic in solicitations. Konkus, who formally works within the EPA’s public affairs workplace, has canceled near $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations.

So blocking $2 million in EPA grants is by some means main inevitably to ISIS rising in Niger. Who sounds incomprehensible once more? Who sounds “flat-out silly”? 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *